The purpose of the interviews was for intelligence gathering and not criminal investigation.
Death note 2006 segunda parte full#
authorities would have full access to the contents of the interrogations (as Canadian officials sought no restrictions on their use) by virtue of their audio and video recording ( CSIS’s Role in the Matter of Omar Khadr, at pp. In conducting their interviews, CSIS officials had control over the questions asked and the subject matter of the interviews … Canadian officials also knew that the U.S. As held by this Court in Khadr 2008, Canada’s participation in the illegal process in place at Guantanamo Bay clearly violated Canada’s binding international obligations ( Khadr 2008, at paras. Khadr was 16 years old at the time and that he had not had access to counsel or to any adult who had his best interests in mind. The statements taken by CSIS and DFAIT were obtained through participation in a regime which was known at the time to have refused detainees the right to challenge the legality of detention by way of habeas corpus. Khadr’s case did not conform to the principles of fundamental justice. We conclude that Canadian conduct in connection with Mr. Khadr the transcripts of the interviews he had given to CSIS and DFAIT in Guantanamo Bay, under s. In 2008, this Court ordered the Canadian government to disclose to Mr. Khadr in order “to prevent a potential grave injustice” from occurring: Khadr v. of the Federal Court issued an interim injunction preventing CSIS and DFAIT agents from further interviewing Mr. authorities to a sleep deprivation technique, known as the “frequent flyer program”, in an effort to make him less resistant to interrogation. Khadr again, with the knowledge that he had been subjected by U.S. In March 2004, a DFAIT official interviewed Mr. Khadr on matters connected to the charges pending against him and shared the product of these interviews with U.S.
In February and September 2003, agents from the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (“CSIS”) and the Foreign Intelligence Division of the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (“DFAIT”) questioned Mr.